Connection to general governance
Human Control and Human Override
Human control and human override are broad governance ideas; under the LUMINA-30 lens, they matter only when a legitimate human can use them effectively before irreversible consequences occur.
Definition
Human control and human override are broad governance ideas; under the LUMINA-30 lens, they matter only when a legitimate human can use them effectively before irreversible consequences occur.
General concept vs. LUMINA-30 usage
This page does not redefine the general terms. It maps them to the narrower LUMINA-30 test: a formal approval, nominal override, or human-in-the-loop arrangement is insufficient if the human cannot understand, refuse, delay, verify, redirect, or stop the relevant process in time.
Why this distinction matters
Control can fail through timing, information asymmetry, organizational pressure, automation bias, inaccessible infrastructure, delegated permissions, or consequences that propagate faster than intervention.
Limits and unknowns
LUMINA-30 does not claim that one interface pattern or control architecture is universally adequate. Technical and institutional effectiveness must be shown for the actual context.
Try the One-Question Pilot
Test whether human control can actually take effect using the official One-Question Pilot ↗.
Official primary sources
These links lead to official LUMINA-30 public materials. This Wiki page is not evidence for the claims it summarizes.