Purpose
This template provides a cautious public note for AI incidents before facts are complete.
Immediate Use Note
Use this note only as an initial boundary-review statement.
It should not claim fault, liability, legal violation, technical cause, adoption, or certification status.
Before using this note, preserve available evidence and check whether the case should first be classified as Not Verifiable under the Absence Rule.
Template
At this stage, the available information is insufficient to reach a conclusion about responsibility, legality, or technical cause.
However, the case raises a LUMINA-30 boundary question:
Was meaningful human refusal authority still effective before any irreversible AI-driven impact?
A first review should identify who held final human refusal authority, whether refusal could have been exercised before irreversible impact, whether logs and approval records are sufficient, and whether AI-generated output became the sole or primary rationale for final action.