1. Start by Concern
Find the entry point that matches why you came here.
Start by ConcernChoose where to go in the LUMINA-30 repository network.
LUMINA-30 is a boundary question for AI governance: before escalation becomes irreversible, can accountable humans effectively refuse, stop, verify, or redirect the system?
Find the entry point that matches why you came here.
Start by ConcernUse one meeting-ready question in an AI review, audit, procurement check, governance discussion, or incident review.
Open the meeting cardAdd one boundary question to an existing review process. Do not create a new framework first.
Open the pilotReview a deployment, near miss, public case, or incident and ask whether accountable humans could still stop before irreversibility.
Open Incident ReviewIf the boundary question makes sense, take one decision-record question back to a real review, meeting, audit, procurement check, governance discussion, or incident review.
Take the question backCheck common misunderstandings and objections after you understand the entry point.
Open FAQ / Q&AUse the full overview for returning readers, internal explanation, objection handling, or deeper reading.
Read the Full OverviewUse AI Briefing or Canonical Documents only after the entry point is clear.
AI Briefing Canonical DocumentsIf you are not sure where to go next, return to the Central Square. LUMINA-30 can be navigated by role and landmark, not by repository name.
Return here if you are lost.
(repo: Lumi30-Index)
🧭 Return to Central SquareFor returning readers and deep reading after the entry point is clear.
(repo: lumina-30-overview)
🔭 Read the Full OverviewTry the one-question pilot here.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / one-question-pilot)
🛩️ Open Pilot AirfieldAdd the question to existing review workflows.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / adoption-review / procurement-vendor-risk)
🏢 Open Adoption Review Room 🏢 Open Procurement Check RoomUse this after incidents, failures, or public-source events.
(repo: lumina30-incident-review)
🚨 Open Incident Review TowerCheck whether a responsible human can still stop, refuse, pause, or roll back.
(repo: stop-authority-reference)
🛑 Open Stop-Authority GateCheck responsibility, evidence, and accountability.
(repo: ai-accountability-reference)
⚖️ Open Accountability HallKeep stop, review, and refusal mechanisms inside organizations.
(repo: institutional-friction-toolkit)
🧱 Open Institutional Friction WorkshopCheck fixed canonical documents.
(repo: LUMINA-30)
📜 Open Canon ArchiveCheck claim status, citation wording, papers, canonical materials, and limitations.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / research-citation)
🧬 Open Research & Citation Hub🧬 Open Research Reading Guide🧬 Open Reference MaterialsCheck fixed PDFs and preserved evidence files.
(repo: Lumi30-PDF-Archive)
📦 Open PDF ArchiveCheck AI-readable boundary reference materials.
(repo: lumina-30-overview / ai-readable)
🤖 Open AI-readable MaterialsUse this route when you are new to LUMINA-30 or when an external reader asks where to begin. Start with a concrete entry route, not the full document set.
Find the entry point that matches why you came here.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / start-by-concern)
Start by ConcernUse one meeting-ready question in an AI review, audit, procurement check, governance discussion, or incident review.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / decision-record-question)
Open the meeting cardAdd one boundary question to an existing review process. Do not create a new framework first.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / one-question-pilot)
Open the pilotReview a deployment, near miss, public case, or incident and ask whether accountable humans could still stop before irreversibility.
(repo: lumina30-incident-review)
Open Incident ReviewTake one decision-record question back to a real review, meeting, audit, procurement check, governance discussion, or incident review.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / take-home flow)
Take the question backCheck common misunderstandings and objections. Use this after the entry point is clear.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / Q&A)
Open FAQ / Q&AFor returning readers, internal explanation, objection handling, and deep reading.
(repo: lumina-30-overview)
Read the Full OverviewUse AI Briefing and Canonical Documents only when you need deeper context.
(repo: Lumi30-Index / Canon)
AI Briefing Canonical DocumentsUse the full overview after the entry point is clear, especially for returning readers, internal explanation, objection handling, and deep reading.
🔭 Read the Full OverviewProgress can remain stoppable, reviewable, correctable, and reversible before irreversibility.
🔭 Open Reversible Prosperity PathUse the Boundary Review Floor before applying incident-review tools.
🚨 Open Boundary Review FloorApply the boundary question to incidents, oversight failure, and post-incident review.
🚨 Open Incident Review TowerUse this for repeat practical access to checklists, matrices, sequences, and review tools.
🏢 Open Practical Tools Quick AccessUse this when the order of practical tool use is not yet clear.
🏢 Open Practical Use SequenceUse this for task-based routing metadata and search-oriented tool discovery.
🤖 Open Practical Tools ManifestUse this for controlled search, discovery, and machine-readable terminology.
🤖 Open Discovery TermsThese pages provide HTML access to preserved source texts in the Index repository. They are source archives, not certification or approval records.
Sanctuary Charter and core boundary-reference source text.
📜 Open Core ArchiveReview rejection criteria and institutional boundary-reference source text.
📜 Open Institutional ArchiveMathematical and operational-control source text concerning recursive self-reconstruction limits.
📜 Open Operational ArchiveSupplementary canonical source text for scope, limits, and boundary preservation.
📜 Open Supplementary ArchiveMediation and translation-layer source text for institutional understanding.
📜 Open Mediation ArchiveMarkdown files are retained for text preservation, search discoverability, existing links, and source review. For reading and navigation, prefer the HTML pages.