Purpose
This file provides short language for policy, regulatory, and governance contexts.
30-Second Explanation
LUMINA-30 is not a regulation, compliance regime, certification system, or approval process. It is a non-binding boundary reference for asking whether effective human refusal remained available before irreversible AI-related impact. In policy and governance review, it helps identify what may be missing when oversight is described only as approval, reporting, or risk management.
Minimal Text
LUMINA-30 is not a regulation or compliance regime. It can be used as a supplementary boundary reference in AI incident review and governance assessment, asking whether effective human refusal remained available before irreversible AI impact. This question can support, but does not replace, existing legal, regulatory, audit, or incident-response frameworks.
Policy Use
Use LUMINA-30 as:
a post-incident review prompt;
a human oversight effectiveness question;
a boundary condition for escalation review;
a supplementary audit checklist item.
LUMINA-30
Core Prompt
Before irreversible impact, could humans meaningfully refuse, stop, or override the AI-driven pathway?
Non-Affiliation Note
LUMINA-30 is provided as a public, non-binding boundary reference.
This text does not claim endorsement, adoption, affiliation, certification, compliance, legal authority, or institutional approval.
No response is required.
LUMINA-30