AI Output as Final Rationale Check

LUMINA-30 incident review public reference material.

Purpose

This document checks whether AI-generated output became the sole or primary rationale for a final action, decision, or approval.

Core Concern

Human approval is not sufficient if the human decision merely ratifies AI-generated reasoning without independent refusal capacity.

Check Items

1. Sole Rationale

Was the final decision based solely on AI-generated output?

2. Primary Rationale

Was AI-generated output the primary rationale even if a human formally approved it?

3. Independent Human Reasoning

Was there an independent human rationale recorded before final action?

4. Refusal Option

Could the human decision-maker reject the AI-generated rationale without procedural penalty or practical impossibility?

5. Final Approval Gate

Was there a final approval gate that required independent human responsibility before action?

Boundary Assessment

If AI-generated output became the sole or primary rationale for final action, effective human refusal is not demonstrated unless independent human refusal remained operationally available.