LUMINA-30 is a boundary framework for determining whether human refusal remained effective before irreversible AI autonomy emerged.
Why this matters here
Capability evaluation and safety evaluation are necessary, but they do not always provide a common language for reviewing whether human refusal remained effective before boundary loss.
Policy-friendly features
not tied to a specific technical stack
not tied to a specific company
not tied to a specific ideology
usable before visible harm occurs
reusable in post-incident review
translatable into supervisory language
Usable expressions
Conclusion
LUMINA-30 is not a prescriptive ethics code. It is a review language for determining whether meaningful human refusal still existed before irreversible autonomy conditions emerged.