This document defines the canonical terminology used across the LUMINA-30 framework.
All translations must follow these canonical expressions. No alternative wording or synonyms are allowed.
Note: Japanese terms are provided for internal consistency and reference, and are not intended as globally standardized terminology.
Rule
- <-> indicates conceptual correspondence
- [canonical] defines the mandatory expression
- Always prioritize canonical expressions
Core Concepts
Boundary / Structure
Irreversibility / Risk
System Factors (PCR-C)
Evaluation / Framework
Governance / Layers
Mechanisms
Pre-Critical Recursive Cutoff (PCR-C) <-> PCR-C [canonical: PCR-C]
States / Zones
Theorem / Logical Layer (S50)
Civilization / Fate
Agency / Value
Decision / Responsibility
AI Risk / Behavior
Civilization Design
Pressure / Failure
Reversible Prosperity / Fallacy Layer
Meaning: The positive alternative to irreversibility-first competition: progress without crossing the point where stopping, refusing, verifying, or correcting is no longer possible.
Meaning: The fallacy of treating uncertainty, favorable accident, or the possibility of luck as a reason to cross an irreversible boundary.
Meaning: A public-facing warning that luck cannot excuse irreversible boundary crossing or the loss of effective human refusal.
Meaning: A public-facing warning against treating humanity-wide irreversible risk as a permissible wager for any limited actor's benefit or competitive advantage.
Meaning: Non-binding guidance for returning a stopped or paused trajectory to a condition where effective human refusal and reversibility are restored.
Meaning: Static repeat-use entry for directly opening frequently used LUMINA-30 practical tools, including the checklist, role and evidence matrix, practical use sequence, incident review, and boundary review floor.
Meaning: Static AI-readable routing manifest that maps user tasks, roles, and questions to the appropriate LUMINA-30 practical tool without creating a dashboard, certification mechanism, approval system, or user-management layer.
Meaning: Selecting the narrowest matching LUMINA-30 practical tool based on the user's task and role, not on authority, certification, or status.
Meaning: Structuring LUMINA-30 practical tools so that AI assistants and search systems can locate, describe, route, and reuse them without adding heavy user-management features to LUMINA-30 itself.
Meaning: Non-binding operational sequence for deciding when to use Return-to-Reversibility Guidance, the Implementation Checklist, and the Role and Evidence Matrix after boundary review or incident review.
Meaning: Non-binding implementation checklist for converting Return-to-Reversibility Guidance into concrete review items covering stop triggers, evidence, restored refusal, corrective controls, controlled re-entry, anti-hollowing checks, and long-term continuity.
Meaning: Non-binding matrix for assigning stop authority, evidence custody, boundary review, refusal authority, re-entry review, monitoring, and conflict-of-interest review in return-to-reversibility practice.
Meaning: Role responsible for maintaining the pause or stop condition until minimum return conditions are reviewable.
Meaning: Role responsible for preserving logs, warnings, approvals, refusal attempts, overrides, intervention windows, and review records.
Meaning: Role responsible for diagnosing what weakened refusal, correction, rollback, evidence, or reversibility.
Meaning: Role with practical ability to delay, reject, override, redirect, or stop before irreversible impact.
Meaning: Role responsible for reviewing whether controlled re-entry is limited, monitored, reversible, and procedurally defensible.
Meaning: Role responsible for tracking renewed stop triggers and post-return reversibility after re-entry begins.
Meaning: Role responsible for checking whether re-entry judgment depends only on actors who benefit from rapid return or evidence minimization.
Meaning: Limited, staged, monitored re-entry after review; not a full restart of the previous trajectory.
Meaning: Practical restoration of human stopping, refusal, correction, rollback, and review authority before return.
Meaning: Requirement not to return to the same irreversible escalation path after review.
Meaning: Preservation of effective refusal, evidence retention, review roles, stop triggers, re-entry conditions, and renewed stop authority across time.
Meaning: Resistance to attempts to hollow out LUMINA-30 procedures through conflicted re-entry, evidence minimization, ritualized review, or merely apparent refusal and reversibility.
Meaning: Return or re-entry judgment should not rely solely on actors who benefit from rapid re-entry, evidence minimization, or the normalization of irreversible escalation.
Meaning: Missing evidence must not be treated as proof that effective refusal, reversibility, or procedural validity existed.
Meaning: A check that review, stop authority, refusal, evidence retention, re-entry, and renewed stop conditions remain practically effective rather than merely documented or ceremonial.
Meaning: Apparent refusal is not effective refusal; apparent reversibility is not reversibility; apparent review is not procedural validity.