G01: Boundary Framework

LUMINA-30 as a boundary framework rather than an ordinary policy, guideline, or ethical appeal.

G01 turns the emotional warning of G00 into a structural framework: what condition separates effective oversight from ceremony?

LUMINA-30 is not a preference for caution. It is a boundary condition for asking whether effective human refusal remained practically available before irreversible consequences occurred.

How to read the figure: the central terms do not describe separate topics. Human refusal authority, the pre-irreversibility threshold, and procedural validity are one structure. If any one of them collapses, oversight can still look present while the boundary has already failed.

Position in LUMINA-30: G01 defines the framework’s center of gravity. It separates LUMINA-30 from ordinary ethics language by asking not whether governance existed, but whether governance preserved the practical power to refuse in time.

Incident-review reading: use G01 to locate the real review question in any case: before the irreversible effect became locked in, who could still refuse, by what mechanism, with what information, and with what actual stopping power?

Detailed explanation

Formal approval, dashboards, reports, or committees are not enough unless refusal remains effective.
The framework is procedural, but not bureaucratic: it tests whether human refusal still mattered at the decisive moment.
G01 should make the reader distrust superficial oversight and look for the boundary where refusal either remains alive or becomes decorative.